First building with a fully integrated computational design and robotic fabrication process

July 2, 2014 § Leave a comment


Macro photos of butterfly wings

March 18, 2014 § Leave a comment

Macro photos of butterfly wingsMacro photos of butterfly wings

IBM researchers put in two 18 hour/day weeks into moving atoms around for this video

February 27, 2014 § Leave a comment

CMYK lamp

February 21, 2014 § Leave a comment

CMYK lamp

Interesting use of LED lights!

“Super Caley Go Ballistic Celtic Are Atrocious”

November 13, 2013 § Leave a comment

Best article on why visit London that i found yet.

Reasons include:

Comically inept government logic

World’s greatest headline writers

You’re never more than three paces away from a sausage

It’s the tower of friendly Babel

Eton Mess is not just a satirical description of the chaps in power

The reason such…

November 13, 2013 § Leave a comment

The reason such travels are mentally useful involves a quirk of cognition, in which problems that feel “close” – and the closeness can be physical, temporal or even emotional – get contemplated in a more concrete manner. As a result, when we think about things that are nearby, our thoughts are constricted, bound by a more limited set of associations. While this habit can be helpful – it allows us to focus on the facts at hand – it also inhibits our imagination. Consider a field of corn. When you’re standing in the middle of the field, surrounded by the tall cellulose stalks and fraying husks, the air smelling faintly of fertiliser and popcorn, your mind is automatically drawn to thoughts that revolve around the primary meaning of corn, which is that it’s a plant, a cereal, a staple of farming.

But now imagine that same field of corn from a different perspective. Instead of standing on a farm, you’re now in the midst of a crowded city street, dense with taxis and pedestrians. (And yet, for some peculiar reason, you’re still thinking about corn.) The plant will no longer just be a plant: instead, your vast neural network will pump out all sorts of associations. You’ll think about glucose-fructose syrup, obesity and Michael Pollan, author of In Defense of Food; ethanol made from corn stalks, popcorn at the cinema and creamy polenta simmering on a wood stove in Emilia Romagna. The noun is now a web of tangents, a loom of remote connections.

What does this have to do with travel? When we escape from the place we spend most of our time, the mind is suddenly made aware of all those errant ideas we’d suppressed. We start thinking about obscure possibilities – corn can fuel cars – that never would have occurred to us if we’d stayed back on the farm. Furthermore, this more relaxed sort of cognition comes with practical advantages, especially when we’re trying to solve difficult problems.

Look, for instance, at a recent experiment led by the psychologist Lile Jia at Indiana University. He randomly divided a few dozen undergrads into two groups, both of which were asked to list as many different modes of transportation as possible. (This is known as a creative generation task.) One group of students was told that the task was developed by Indiana University students studying abroad in Greece (the distant condition), while the other group was told that the task was developed by Indiana students studying in Indiana (the near condition). At first glance, it’s hard to believe that such a slight and seemingly irrelevant difference would alter the performance of the subjects. Why would it matter where the task was conceived?

Nevertheless, Jia found a striking difference between the two groups: when students were told that the task was imported from Greece, they came up with significantly more transportation possibilities. They didn’t just list buses, trains and planes; they cited horses, triremes, spaceships, bicycles and even Segway scooters. Because the source of the problem was far away, the subjects felt less constrained by their local transport options; they didn’t just think about getting around in Indiana – they thought about getting around all over the world and even in deep space.

From “Why we travel” – Jonah Lehrer
The Observer, Sunday 14 March 2010

Geoffrey West: the surprising math of cities and corporations

November 11, 2013 § Leave a comment

“Cities are just a physical manifestation of your interactions/our interactions and the clustering and grouping of individuals”
Plus a very good explanation to why modern life (and by that I’m referring to technological and scientifically discoveries, which in turn impact everyday life) is moving at such speed- it basically has to in order to survive!

Where Am I?

You are currently browsing the Research category at simociocoiu.